Analysis by Collins (2007) and others highlights that amicus briefs can certainly make a distinction in authorized proceedings. Nevertheless, there’s rising concern that a few of these committees could also be performing extra like lobbyists than true “associates” of the courtroom. Attorneys should not have the identical skilled requirements, laws, or traditions as forensic psychologists (e.g., transparency and neutrality). Dr. Maddux weighs in on the moral concerns for consultants concerned in these multidisciplinary amicus committees.
The Forensic Psychology Apply and Coverage Lab advances uncared for forensic psychology scholarship to assist the broader forensic observe neighborhood and to tell policymakers. This clip represents the start of an ongoing dialog and sequence of publications to assist forensic psychologists and different multidisciplinary crew members navigate the sophisticated moral panorama of serving alongside authorized counsel within the preparation of amicus briefs.
Be taught extra about Dr. Maddux’s perspective on this temporary clip from Amicus Committee’s Youngster Advocacy within the Courts: Increasing Our Understanding of Youngster Maltreatment, introduced at APSAC’s thirty first Annual Colloquium in 2024.